{"schema_version":"1.7.2","id":"OESA-2026-2216","modified":"2026-05-09T12:30:55Z","published":"2026-05-09T12:30:55Z","upstream":["CVE-2026-25674","CVE-2026-33033","CVE-2026-4277","CVE-2026-4292"],"summary":"python-django security update","details":"A high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nAn issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.3, 5.2 before 5.2.12, and 4.2 before 4.2.29. Race condition in file-system storage and file-based cache backends in Django allows an attacker to cause file system objects to be created with incorrect permissions via concurrent requests, where one thread's temporary `umask` change affects other threads in multi-threaded environments. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Tarek Nakkouch for reporting this issue.(CVE-2026-25674)\n\nAn issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.4, 5.2 before 5.2.13, and 4.2 before 4.2.30.\n`MultiPartParser` allows remote attackers to degrade performance by submitting multipart uploads with `Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64` including excessive whitespace.\nEarlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.\nDjango would like to thank Seokchan Yoon for reporting this issue.(CVE-2026-33033)\n\nAn issue was discovered in Django's GenericInlineModelAdmin component. Add permissions on inline model instances were not validated on submission of forged POST data. This vulnerability affects Django 6.0 before 6.0.4, 5.2 before 5.2.13, and 4.2 before 4.2.30. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank N05ec@LZU-DSLab for reporting this issue.(CVE-2026-4277)\n\nAn issue was discovered in Django 6.0 before 6.0.4, 5.2 before 5.2.13, and 4.2 before 4.2.30. Admin changelist forms using ModelAdmin.list_editable incorrectly allowed new instances to be created via forged POST data. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Cantina for reporting this issue.(CVE-2026-4292)","affected":[{"package":{"ecosystem":"openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4","name":"python-django","purl":"pkg:rpm/openEuler/python-django&distro=openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4"},"ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.2.27-22.oe2003sp4"}]}],"ecosystem_specific":{"noarch":["python-django-help-2.2.27-22.oe2003sp4.noarch.rpm","python3-Django-2.2.27-22.oe2003sp4.noarch.rpm"],"src":["python-django-2.2.27-22.oe2003sp4.src.rpm"]}}],"references":[{"type":"ADVISORY","url":"https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2026-2216"},{"type":"ADVISORY","url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-25674"},{"type":"ADVISORY","url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33033"},{"type":"ADVISORY","url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-4277"},{"type":"ADVISORY","url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-4292"}],"database_specific":{"severity":"Critical"}}