License: Artistic-2.0

1 Introduction

Proteomics data, such as the one produced through the Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC), can have a massive amount of missing values, in which imputing can result in regressing to the mean, underestimating protein expression variability. In such a setting, skipping missing values from the calculations may constitute a suitable alternative to imputation. The GSVA package provides a missing data policy for the GSVA and ssGSEA methods, which we illustrate here with the proteomics data from Costa et al. (2021) and available in the GSVAdata experiment data package. We start loading the data as follows.

library(SummarizedExperiment)
library(GSVA)
library(GSVAdata)

data(geneprotExpCostaEtAl2021)
ls()
 [1] "DEpwys"                              "DEpwys_es"                          
 [3] "MSY"                                 "X"                                  
 [5] "XiE"                                 "XiEgenesEntrez"                     
 [7] "adaptivegsets"                       "adaptivepat"                        
 [9] "brainTxDbSets"                       "c2.dupgenesets"                     
[11] "c2BroadSets"                         "c7.genesets"                        
[13] "c7.genesets.filt"                    "canonicalC2BroadSets"               
[15] "es"                                  "esmicro"                            
[17] "esrnaseq"                            "excludepat"                         
[19] "fircolor"                            "fit"                                
[21] "fit.eb"                              "fit.eb.trend"                       
[23] "fname"                               "fnames"                             
[25] "gbmPar"                              "gbm_es"                             
[27] "gbm_eset"                            "geneExpCostaEtAl2021"               
[29] "geneSetLabels"                       "geneSetOrder"                       
[31] "genecorrs"                           "genesbygo"                          
[33] "gmtfname"                            "goannot"                            
[35] "gs"                                  "gsetClust"                          
[37] "gssizes"                             "gsva.es"                            
[39] "gsvaPar"                             "gsvapar"                            
[41] "hmcol"                               "huangArrayRMAnoBatchCommon_eset"    
[43] "huangPar"                            "innategsets"                        
[45] "innatepat"                           "labrow"                             
[47] "lcpms"                               "mask"                               
[49] "maskHuangFemale"                     "maskHuangMale"                      
[51] "maskPickrellFemale"                  "maskPickrellMale"                   
[53] "mod"                                 "mod0"                               
[55] "msYgenesEntrez"                      "n"                                  
[57] "p"                                   "pickrellCountsArgonneCQNcommon_eset"
[59] "pickrellCountsYaleCQNcommon_eset"    "pickrellPar"                        
[61] "protExpCostaEtAl2021"                "pwycorrs"                           
[63] "pwyexpcol"                           "res"                                
[65] "rmsy"                                "rxie"                               
[67] "sam_col_map"                         "sampleClust"                        
[69] "sampleOrderBySubtype"                "se"                                 
[71] "sexpch"                              "subtypeColorLegend"                 
[73] "subtypeOrder"                        "subtypeXtable"                      
[75] "sv"                                  "tt"                                 
protExpCostaEtAl2021
class: RangedSummarizedExperiment 
dim: 245 20 
metadata(1): annotation
assays(3): logCPM log2protexp log2protexpimp
rownames(245): 5715 9973 ... 25793 7094
rowData names(2): Symbol UniquePeptides
colnames(20): BS03 BS05 ... BS23 BS24
colData names(2): FIR Sex
assayNames(protExpCostaEtAl2021)
[1] "logCPM"         "log2protexp"    "log2protexpimp"

The data is stored in a SummarizedExperiment object called protExpCostaEtAl2021 with three assays:

  • logCPM with the normalized log-CPM RNA-seq expression values for the 245 genes encoding the quantified proteins.
  • log2protexp with the normalized protein units of expression, and the missing quantifications specified by NA values.
  • log2protexpimp with the normalized protein units of expression, but where the missing quantifications have been imputed.

Please consult the publication in (Costa et al. 2021) for details on how these data have been produced.

2 Load gene sets

We will use the MSigDB C7 collection of immunologic genesets, reading them with the readGMT() function of the GSVA package.

library(GSEABase)

URL <- "https://data.broadinstitute.org/gsea-msigdb/msigdb/release/2024.1.Hs/c7.immunesigdb.v2024.1.Hs.symbols.gmt"
c7.genesets <- readGMT(URL)
GeneSetCollection
  names: GOLDRATH_EFF_VS_MEMORY_CD8_TCELL_DN, GOLDRATH_EFF_VS_MEMORY_CD8_TCELL_UP, ..., KAECH_NAIVE_VS_MEMORY_CD8_TCELL_UP (4872 total)
  unique identifiers: ABCA2, ABCC5, ..., LINC00841 (20457 total)
  types in collection:
    geneIdType: SymbolIdentifier (1 total)
    collectionType: NullCollection (1 total)

We filter this collection of gene sets to those formed by gene upregulated in innate leukocytes and adaptive mature lymphocytes, excluding those reported in studies on myeloid cells and the lupus autoimmune disease.

innatepat <- c("NKCELL_VS_.+_UP", "MAST_CELL_VS_.+_UP",
               "EOSINOPHIL_VS_.+_UP", "BASOPHIL_VS_.+_UP",
               "MACROPHAGE_VS_.+_UP", "NEUTROPHIL_VS_.+_UP")
innatepat <- paste(innatepat, collapse="|")
innategsets <- names(c7.genesets)[grep(innatepat, names(c7.genesets))]
length(innategsets)
[1] 53

adaptivepat <- c("CD4_TCELL_VS_.+_UP", "CD8_TCELL_VS_.+_UP", "BCELL_VS_.+_UP")
adaptivepat <- paste(adaptivepat, collapse="|")
adaptivegsets <- names(c7.genesets)[grep(adaptivepat, names(c7.genesets))]
excludepat <- c("NAIVE", "LUPUS", "MYELOID")
excludepat <- paste(excludepat, collapse="|")
adaptivegsets <- adaptivegsets[-grep(excludepat, adaptivegsets)]
length(adaptivegsets)
[1] 97

c7.genesets.filt <- c7.genesets[c(innategsets, adaptivegsets)]
length(c7.genesets.filt)
[1] 150

3 Usage and benchmark with the RNA-seq data

Here we show first a quick benchmarking using the logCPM expression profiles, which are complete, by introducing NA values with the pattern of missing data observed in the corresponding proteins.

logCPMsWithNAs <- assay(protExpCostaEtAl2021, "logCPM")
logCPMsWithNAs[1:5, 1:5]
          BS03     BS05     BS06     BS07     BS08
5715  3.826346 3.785976 3.016652 3.641209 3.547332
9973  3.028686 2.633021 3.281683 3.382893 2.699961
5688  5.101717 5.404292 4.314238 4.136742 4.969074
10627 7.622114 7.779064 6.894152 7.239640 7.899282
8672  7.077862 7.725863 6.068174 6.156980 6.970647
logCPMsWithNAs[is.na(assay(protExpCostaEtAl2021, "log2protexp"))] <- NA
logCPMsWithNAs[1:5, 1:5]
          BS03     BS05     BS06     BS07     BS08
5715  3.826346 3.785976       NA 3.641209 3.547332
9973        NA 2.633021       NA       NA       NA
5688  5.101717       NA       NA       NA       NA
10627       NA 7.779064       NA 7.239640       NA
8672  7.077862 7.725863 6.068174 6.156980 6.970647

We need to add the annotation metadata to this new matrix of expression profiles with missing values.

gsvaAnnotation(logCPMsWithNAs) <- EntrezIdentifier("org.Hs.eg.db")

When building the parameter object, GSVA will check automatically for the presence of missing values whenever the input expression data container is a non-sparse container of expression values, such as a base matrix object or a SummarizedExperiment object.

gsvapar <- gsvaParam(logCPMsWithNAs, c7.genesets.filt, minSize=5)
! Input expression data has NA values, which will be propagated through calculations

We can force the gsvaParam() function to check for missing values irrespective of the input expression data container by setting the argument checkNA="yes", or disable that check altogether with checkNA="no". By default checkNA="auto". Once missing values have been detected when we build the parameter object, the gsva() function (or gsvaRanks() and gsvaScores()) will apply a missing data policy specified through a parameter called use, which takes one of the following three possible character string values: everything, all.obs or na.rm. The first value (everything) is the default value and it propagates the missing NA values through the calculations.

es_gsva_everything <- gsva(gsvapar)
ℹ GSVA version 2.6.0
ℹ Searching for rows with constant values
ℹ Calculating GSVA ranks
ℹ kcdf='auto' (default)
ℹ GSVA dense (classical) algorithm
ℹ Row-wise ECDF estimation with Gaussian kernels
ℹ Calculating row ECDFs
ℹ Calculating column ranks
ℹ Mapping identifiers
ℹ GSVA dense (classical) algorithm
ℹ Calculating GSVA scores for 36 gene sets
✔ Calculations finished
es_gsva_everything[1:10, 1:4]
                                                          BS03 BS05 BS06 BS07
GSE18804_SPLEEN_MACROPHAGE_VS_BRAIN_TUMORAL_MACROPHAGE_UP   NA   NA   NA   NA
GSE2585_THYMIC_MACROPHAGE_VS_MTEC_UP                        NA   NA   NA   NA
GSE27786_NKCELL_VS_NEUTROPHIL_UP                            NA   NA   NA   NA
GSE27786_NKCELL_VS_NKTCELL_UP                               NA   NA   NA   NA
GSE27859_MACROPHAGE_VS_DC_UP                                NA   NA   NA   NA
GSE3982_EOSINOPHIL_VS_BASOPHIL_UP                           NA   NA   NA   NA
GSE3982_MAST_CELL_VS_BASOPHIL_UP                            NA   NA   NA   NA
GSE3982_MAST_CELL_VS_BCELL_UP                               NA   NA   NA   NA
GSE3982_MAST_CELL_VS_CENT_MEMORY_CD4_TCELL_UP               NA   NA   NA   NA
GSE3982_MAST_CELL_VS_DC_UP                                  NA   NA   NA   NA
all(is.na(es_gsva_everything))
[1] TRUE

So, in this case, there are so many missing values that the resulting enrichment scores are all NA values. If we try the second option use="all.obs" it will immediately produce an error at the parameter building step.

gsvapar <- gsvaParam(logCPMsWithNAs, c7.genesets.filt, minSize=5,
                     use="all.obs")
Error in `.check_for_na_values()`:
✖ Input expression data has NA values.

Finally, if we set use="na.rm", missing NA values will be skipped during calculations, giving the chance to obtain non-missing enrichment scores for those gene sets with enough genes with non-missing expression values.

gsvapar <- gsvaParam(logCPMsWithNAs, c7.genesets.filt, minSize=5,
                     use="na.rm")
! Input expression data has NA values, which will be discarded from calculations
es_gsva_narm <- gsva(gsvapar)
ℹ GSVA version 2.6.0
ℹ Searching for rows with constant values
ℹ Calculating GSVA ranks
ℹ kcdf='auto' (default)
ℹ GSVA dense (classical) algorithm
ℹ Row-wise ECDF estimation with Gaussian kernels
ℹ Calculating row ECDFs
ℹ Calculating column ranks
ℹ Mapping identifiers
ℹ GSVA dense (classical) algorithm
ℹ Calculating GSVA scores for 36 gene sets
! NA enrichment scores in gene sets with less than 5 genes after removing missing values
✔ Calculations finished
round(es_gsva_narm[1:10, 1:4], digits=2)
                                                           BS03  BS05 BS06 BS07
GSE18804_SPLEEN_MACROPHAGE_VS_BRAIN_TUMORAL_MACROPHAGE_UP    NA  0.41   NA   NA
GSE2585_THYMIC_MACROPHAGE_VS_MTEC_UP                         NA    NA   NA   NA
GSE27786_NKCELL_VS_NEUTROPHIL_UP                             NA -0.30   NA   NA
GSE27786_NKCELL_VS_NKTCELL_UP                             -0.07  0.06 0.56   NA
GSE27859_MACROPHAGE_VS_DC_UP                               0.15 -0.08   NA   NA
GSE3982_EOSINOPHIL_VS_BASOPHIL_UP                          0.62  0.68   NA 0.29
GSE3982_MAST_CELL_VS_BASOPHIL_UP                           0.30  0.25   NA 0.27
GSE3982_MAST_CELL_VS_BCELL_UP                              0.12  0.20   NA   NA
GSE3982_MAST_CELL_VS_CENT_MEMORY_CD4_TCELL_UP              0.57  0.51   NA 0.32
GSE3982_MAST_CELL_VS_DC_UP                                   NA    NA   NA   NA

These parameters work exactly in the same way with the ssGSEA method.

ssgseapar <- ssgseaParam(logCPMsWithNAs, c7.genesets.filt, minSize=5,
                         use="na.rm")
! Input expression data has NA values, which will be discarded from calculations
es_ssgsea_narm <- gsva(ssgseapar)
ℹ GSVA version 2.6.0
ℹ Searching for rows with constant values
ℹ Mapping identifiers
ℹ Calculating ssGSEA scores for 36 gene sets
! NA enrichment scores in gene sets with less than 5 genes after removing missing values
! NA enrichment scores in gene sets with less than 5 genes after removing missing values
ℹ Normalizing ssGSEA scores
✔ Calculations finished
round(es_ssgsea_narm[1:10, 1:4], digits=2)
                                                          BS03 BS05 BS06 BS07
GSE18804_SPLEEN_MACROPHAGE_VS_BRAIN_TUMORAL_MACROPHAGE_UP   NA 0.27   NA   NA
GSE2585_THYMIC_MACROPHAGE_VS_MTEC_UP                        NA   NA   NA   NA
GSE27786_NKCELL_VS_NEUTROPHIL_UP                            NA 0.13   NA   NA
GSE27786_NKCELL_VS_NKTCELL_UP                             0.15 0.21 0.12   NA
GSE27859_MACROPHAGE_VS_DC_UP                              0.15 0.18   NA   NA
GSE3982_EOSINOPHIL_VS_BASOPHIL_UP                         0.52 0.60   NA 0.30
GSE3982_MAST_CELL_VS_BASOPHIL_UP                          0.10 0.18   NA 0.18
GSE3982_MAST_CELL_VS_BCELL_UP                             0.30 0.54   NA   NA
GSE3982_MAST_CELL_VS_CENT_MEMORY_CD4_TCELL_UP             0.18 0.10   NA 0.09
GSE3982_MAST_CELL_VS_DC_UP                                  NA   NA   NA   NA

Since we are doing calculations on the RNA-seq data, for which we have the complete logCPM values, we can compare how close are the enrichment scores obtained by skipping NA values from the ones obtained with the complete data, for both GSVA and ssGSEA. First, we calculate the enrichment scores with the complete data for each of the two methods.

gsvaAnnotation(protExpCostaEtAl2021) <- EntrezIdentifier("org.Hs.eg.db")
gsvapar <- gsvaParam(protExpCostaEtAl2021, c7.genesets.filt,
                     assay="logCPM", minSize=5)
es_gsva <- gsva(gsvapar)
ℹ GSVA version 2.6.0
ℹ Searching for rows with constant values
ℹ Calculating GSVA ranks
ℹ kcdf='auto' (default)
ℹ GSVA dense (classical) algorithm
ℹ Row-wise ECDF estimation with Gaussian kernels
ℹ Calculating row ECDFs
ℹ Calculating column ranks
ℹ Mapping identifiers
ℹ GSVA dense (classical) algorithm
ℹ Calculating GSVA scores for 36 gene sets
✔ Calculations finished
ssgseapar <- ssgseaParam(protExpCostaEtAl2021, c7.genesets.filt,
                         assay="logCPM", minSize=5)
es_ssgsea <- gsva(ssgseapar)
ℹ GSVA version 2.6.0
ℹ Searching for rows with constant values
ℹ Mapping identifiers
ℹ Calculating ssGSEA scores for 36 gene sets
ℹ Normalizing ssGSEA scores
✔ Calculations finished

Second, we calculate and plot the correlations between the enrichment scores obtained from the data with missing values with the ones obtained from the complete data.

r_es_gsva <- r_es_ssgsea <- numeric(nrow(es_gsva))
for (i in 1:nrow(es_gsva)) {
    r_es_gsva[i] <- cor(assay(es_gsva)[i, ], es_gsva_narm[i, ], use="complete.obs")
    r_es_ssgsea[i] <- cor(assay(es_ssgsea)[i, ], es_ssgsea_narm[i, ], use="complete.obs")
}
boxplot(list(GSVA=r_es_gsva, ssGSEA=r_es_ssgsea),
    ylab="Correlation with complete data", las=1)
Correlation between enrichment scores calculated from RNA-seq expression profiles with missing values, and those calculated from the complete version of the same data.

Figure 1: Correlation between enrichment scores calculated from RNA-seq expression profiles with missing values, and those calculated from the complete version of the same data

As we can see in Figure 1 GSVA scores calculated by skipping missing values correlate better with those calculated from the complete data, than ssGSEA scores calculated in the same way.

Session information

Here is the output of sessionInfo() on the system on which this document was compiled running pandoc 2.7.3:

sessionInfo()
R version 4.6.0 RC (2026-04-17 r89917)
Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Running under: Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS

Matrix products: default
BLAS:   /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.23-bioc/R/lib/libRblas.so 
LAPACK: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lapack/liblapack.so.3.12.0  LAPACK version 3.12.0

locale:
 [1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8       LC_NUMERIC=C              
 [3] LC_TIME=en_GB              LC_COLLATE=C              
 [5] LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8    LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8   
 [7] LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8       LC_NAME=C                 
 [9] LC_ADDRESS=C               LC_TELEPHONE=C            
[11] LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C       

time zone: America/New_York
tzcode source: system (glibc)

attached base packages:
[1] stats4    stats     graphics  grDevices utils     datasets  methods  
[8] base     

other attached packages:
 [1] sva_3.60.0                  BiocParallel_1.46.0        
 [3] genefilter_1.94.0           mgcv_1.9-4                 
 [5] nlme_3.1-169                RColorBrewer_1.1-3         
 [7] edgeR_4.10.0                limma_3.68.0               
 [9] GSVAdata_1.47.3             SummarizedExperiment_1.42.0
[11] GenomicRanges_1.64.0        Seqinfo_1.2.0              
[13] MatrixGenerics_1.24.0       matrixStats_1.5.0          
[15] GSEABase_1.74.0             graph_1.90.0               
[17] annotate_1.90.0             XML_3.99-0.23              
[19] org.Hs.eg.db_3.23.1         AnnotationDbi_1.74.0       
[21] IRanges_2.46.0              S4Vectors_0.50.0           
[23] Biobase_2.72.0              BiocGenerics_0.58.0        
[25] generics_0.1.4              GSVA_2.6.0                 
[27] BiocStyle_2.40.0           

loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
 [1] blob_1.3.0                  Biostrings_2.80.0          
 [3] fastmap_1.2.0               SingleCellExperiment_1.34.0
 [5] digest_0.6.39               rsvd_1.0.5                 
 [7] lifecycle_1.0.5             survival_3.8-6             
 [9] statmod_1.5.1               KEGGREST_1.52.0            
[11] RSQLite_2.4.6               magrittr_2.0.5             
[13] compiler_4.6.0              rlang_1.2.0                
[15] sass_0.4.10                 tools_4.6.0                
[17] yaml_2.3.12                 knitr_1.51                 
[19] S4Arrays_1.12.0             bit_4.6.0                  
[21] DelayedArray_0.38.0         abind_1.4-8                
[23] HDF5Array_1.40.0            memuse_4.2-3               
[25] grid_4.6.0                  beachmat_2.28.0            
[27] xtable_1.8-8                Rhdf5lib_2.0.0             
[29] tinytex_0.59                cli_3.6.6                  
[31] rmarkdown_2.31              crayon_1.5.3               
[33] otel_0.2.0                  httr_1.4.8                 
[35] rjson_0.2.23                DelayedMatrixStats_1.34.0  
[37] DBI_1.3.0                   cachem_1.1.0               
[39] rhdf5_2.56.0                splines_4.6.0              
[41] parallel_4.6.0              BiocManager_1.30.27        
[43] XVector_0.52.0              vctrs_0.7.3                
[45] Matrix_1.7-5                jsonlite_2.0.0             
[47] bookdown_0.46               BiocSingular_1.28.0        
[49] bit64_4.8.0                 irlba_2.3.7                
[51] magick_2.9.1                locfit_1.5-9.12            
[53] h5mread_1.4.0               jquerylib_0.1.4            
[55] glue_1.8.1                  codetools_0.2-20           
[57] ScaledMatrix_1.20.0         pillar_1.11.1              
[59] htmltools_0.5.9             rhdf5filters_1.24.0        
[61] R6_2.6.1                    sparseMatrixStats_1.24.0   
[63] evaluate_1.0.5              lattice_0.22-9             
[65] png_0.1-9                   SpatialExperiment_1.22.0   
[67] memoise_2.0.1               bslib_0.10.0               
[69] Rcpp_1.1.1-1.1              SparseArray_1.12.0         
[71] xfun_0.57                   pkgconfig_2.0.3

References

Costa, Daniel, Núria Bonet, Amanda Solé, José Manuel González de Aledo-Castillo, Eduard Sabidó, Ferran Casals, Carlota Rovira, et al. 2021. “Genome-Wide Postnatal Changes in Immunity Following Fetal Inflammatory Response.” The FEBS Journal 288 (7): 2311–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.15578.