Bruce Levine -- The Fall of the House of Dixie: The Civil War and the Social Revolution That Transformed the South ==================================================================================================================== This is actually several books, and when reading it, you can get multiple things out of it. Yes, there is history about the U.S. Civil War. But, there is also a good deal of information and description of the society out of which that war and the necessity of that war came. I use the word "necessity" purposefully. Given the social conditions and structure of the antebellum South in the U.S., there was really no way that the institution of slavery could have been given up voluntarily. This was especially true of the elites in the South (the Master class) that depended on slavery for the maintenance of their lifestyle. Giving up that lifestyle and the institution of slavery on which it was based, after having been raised with those benefits and attitudes would have been such a radical change as to have been unimaginable. And, of course it is a book about slavery. There is some good explanation about how brutal and punishing slavery as practiced in the South before the Civil War actually was. This was not just hard work at low wages, or even at *no* wages. It was forced labor driven by physical pain and punishment to extract the most labor at the least cost. That has several implications. (1) It inflicted severe suffering on those enslaved. (2) It was in support of an economic system that depended on that cost/benefit ratio, an amount of benefit that could be delivered at that cost *only if* it was driven by physical punishment and using minimal food to keep it going. And, yet another reason why this war had to be fought and could not be avoided in spite of the incredible and horrid costs and loss of life and suffering was because those in the North feared the advancement of slavery in new states as territories were made into states of the Union. That would tip control of the U.S. federal government to the slave states. And, those in the South feared the converse. There was likely no way to resolve this without fighting. In addition, this is a book about the attitudes and mind set that enabled a society to allow itself to keep such an inhumane institution in place. You'll learn about some of the justifications and rationalizations used disguise that privileged position and the suffering that resulted from it: (1) It's good for them (the slaves) and their family structure. (2) They are loyal and thankful for it. (3) They would not be able to take care of themselves. (4) This is the only possible structure for a just society. And, so on. Those justifications are transparently lies that were told to justify something that these members of this society did not want to give up. But, even as history, this book has something extra to add. It traces the effect of various battles and of the news of victories and losses (1) on the attitudes of Northerners and Southerners, and upon the whether elections in the North would deliver the political leaders needed to prosecute the war and (2) on attitudes in the South and the efforts of political leaders in the South to maintain support for a war that was essentially a fight to maintain the benefits of the institution of slavery for a small slice of the population. One, of the very valuable and fascinating aspects of Levine's work is the letters that he quotes, especially letters written by women in the Master class in the South. Learning about their attitudes and about their ideas and feelings, as their way of life approached its end, is very revealing. Perhaps even more important for us here today in the U.S. are the residual effects of the society and the mindset that enabled it. Levine gives some description description of that mindset and psychology, but it is way more complex than he has space for. In part it involves a master to slave relationship in which masters refused to allow their authority to be challenged and in which they met any perceived challenges with brutality and punishment. There was a code of honor and authority and dominance there, and I believe that we are still living with the effects of that code and the militancy that it entails. Levine gives some help, though perhaps not enough, with demystifying something that I've wondered about. The institution of slavery was a benefit to slave owners, so it is understandable why *they* would be willing to go to war to save it. But, what about non-slave owners in the South. Why were they willing to fight, suffer, and die to save it? Some of the answers that show through in this book are: (1) White supremacy and a believe that the white to black relationship must be maintained. (2) The belief by those who did not own slaves that freedom for blacks would put themselves down at a level equal to blacks, something they could not face. (3) Southern patriotism and devotion to the South as a separate region. (4) Belief that free slaves would cause turmoil, a breakup of social order, and riots. (5) A core belief that the South without slavery was unimaginable. (6) A fervent desire that blacks be kept subservient and whites be supreme. Giving up those beliefs and feelings is hard. There is little wonder that they were so difficult to give up. I wonder whether they have yet. One side light -- Levine believes, if I interpret him correctly, that there was a growing realization in the North that, not only must the slaves be freed, but that (1) the support of freed slaves was necessary for a successful war effort (both in behind the lines support and in active battle) and that that support must be denied to the Southern war effort. And, Levine gives accounts by a number of those who fought near them about how effective freed slaves were in the fight. More notes about the war: (1) Increasing and very high desertion rates in the Southern army toward the end of the war helped lead to the defeat of those armies even in the face of the willingness of political (and military?) leaders to fight on regardless of cost and lives lost. (2) The treatment of black soldiers fighting for the North by Southern soldiers was merciless; there were instances of "take no prisoners" style slaughter of Northern black units by Southern white units. If you want to understand more about what the South was, about what it became after the Civil War, and what it has become today, then I'd recommend these: - "The mind of the South", by W.J. Cash - "Race and reunion", by David W. Blight - "The new mind of the South", by Tracy Thompson You will learn about the characteristics of the Old South and about Southern culture from "Fall of the house of Dixie", but you will get even more of that from the above three books. Some of those characteristics: (1) militarism, patriotism, and a tendency to view violence as the answer; (2) religiosity, and also a belief that "God is on our side"; (3) racism, identity defined by race, white supremacy, and a belief or feeling that race and cast was needed to maintain feelings of self worth. It's a fascinating subject, though not always a cheerful one, and it has consequences even now in the society and politics here in the U.S. 06/18/2013 .. vim:ft=rst:fo+=a: