Tyler Cowen -- Average is over ============================== I'm conflicted about this book: On the one hand, I'm put off a bit by the obviousness of much of what Cowen has to say, by his repeated insistence that we need to learn skills that are unique and valuable and in demand. But, then I also feel that there is a good deal of value to be had from thinking about how the labor market has changed and will likely to change in the future, and about what our relationships with our employers are likely to be like. One of Cowen's central claims is that we are living in an increasingly *unequal* world, and the meritocratic hiring and employment conditions in that skewed world are likely to push us in the direction of *more* inequality. One view we can take of this kind of claim and description is that it is descriptive, and is not an attempt at giving recommendations: it's not a prescription for individuals, nor for companies, nor for our society and government institutions. But, taken another way, it is a call for each of us who hopes to find a good or a better job to think about what kind of education we should be engaging in and what kind of skills and abilities we each should be trying to acquire. Given that, here is some advice to the reader -- Do not agree with Cowen's conclusions. Rather use his topics as starting points to analyze your own skills and experience, and to think about what changes you might make to improve your own chances of getting the job and work you want. For example, given Cowen's guidance, you might be asking (1) what skills do I have? (2) Are they reasonably unique or at least not so common as to make them in demand in the labor market. And, (3) what could I do to improve those skills in a what that fits with employment needs. Cowen is a "critical thinking skills" and a "higher order thinking" kind of person. He is recommending that we each have as a goal to not just *know* things, but also to know how to *do* things. Going one step further, he'd recommend being able not just to do something, but to be able to solve (new) problems. Technical knowledge is good; being able to use that knowledge is better; and being able to solve (new) problems (using that knowledge) is best. Here are some recommendations that Cowen has for every future/potential job seeker. (1) Learn how to think symbolically. Learn how to think abstractly, to think in terms of kinds of object, the attributes or qualities of those objects, etc. (2) Learn how to think in terms of quantities. Learn how to think mathematically and algebraically, that is, in terms of formulas, equations, and relationships that describe the world. (3) Learn how to think in terms of relationships and connections. Learn how to describe the world in terms of objects (or symbols that represent them), and in terms of relationships that connect those objects. (4) Problem solving -- Learn how to use your representations of the world to solve problems, to come up with new kinds of conclusions, to formulate new perspectives. In general, these are recommendations to come up with new representations, new descriptions of any given problem domain, in order to facilitate new ways revealing the kinds of objects in that problem space, new ways of ordering those objects, and new ways of combining them in solutions. Cowen emphasizes that merely knowing how to use a computer is not enough. I suppose that he is trying to tell us that (1) we must be able to do something valuable with a computer and (2) the ability to do that kind of task must be unique, valuable, and in demand in the labor market. Cowen's way of phrase this is to say that in order to be valuable, our skills must *complement* a computer's capabilities. I'm guessing that by skills that complement a computer's capabilities he means that you must be able to use the computer to do something it can't do alone *and* that you must be able to use the computer to do something that could not be done by someone with a mere 8 hours of training. Cowen would likely to make suggestions like (1) we need to be able to set-up a computer so that it can perform some task and even that we need to be able to devise a problem description/representation that enables us to set-up the computer for its task. Computers are especially good at brute-force tasks requiring lots of iteration, but higher-order thinking and problem solving is required to prepare them to do those tasks. Of course, you've got to add to this a need to stay ahead of the "skills curve". The skills that were unique and valuable yesterday will not necessarily be those that are valuable today or tomorrow. And, given Cowen's repeated insistence that computers are gaining new abilities everyday, the capabilities that complement what a computer can do today, may be readily doable by a computer tomorrow, perhaps even doable by a computer at less cost than poorly paid human laborers. One interesting aspect of Cowen's analysis is his emphasis on the need for teamwork in the modern employment landscape. Many more tasks today are too complex and too large to be accomplished by individuals working alone. Although this makes sense to me, it is hard for me to see how it does not go in the direction of more meetings and more mid-level managers. Yes, the modern work-space does require organization, perhaps, lots of it; and, yes, we will need those who can create and manage that organization. But, I suppose because of my own background as a worker rather than I manager, I've a preference to value those who *do* rather than those who *manage*. Time spent in a meeting is time that cannot be used productively to solve a problem or produce something of value for the company that employs me. The need for team efforts points out other qualities that Cowen believes are important, specifically things that center around "works well with others", is responsible and dependable, and even works well with minimal supervision. Summary -- It's not a book about how to fix the skewed labor market place and its inequities. It's about how we and especially individuals looking for work can respond intelligently to that changing labor market place. 12/31/2013 .. vim:ft=rst:fo+=a: