Craig Childs -- Apocalyptic planet: field guide to the everending earth ========================================================================= Childs' time scales are huge. He forces our minds out of the immediate present into historical and geological time spans that are thousands, millions, and even hundreds of millions of years long. Because of that immense vision, the period we are in now is not a singular event; it has been here before, some number of times. We are now in an inter-glacial, a period between glaciations or ice ages. Ice will return. Childs claims that deserts will return. It's likely that periods of cold and periods of heat and periods of long-term drought and periods of deserts etc will come and go any number of times in the future. And, due to that expanded vision, we can appreciate that we are living in an ideal, felicitous moment in our planet's life, one that is especially agreeable and supportive. Our planet was not always like this. It will be at some time in the future, likely at any number of times in the future very unlike the conditions we are now in and very disagreeable to life that is anything like us or the plants and animals we are familiar with. The system we live in is chaotic; it is best described at some levels by the concepts of chaos theory. Our earth and its geological mechanics, our weather system, our oceans and their currents, the ice sheets that cover Greenland and Antarctica now (but who knows for how long) all are nonlinear, chaotic, and unpredictable, if they are deterministic at all. That means that, depending on your level of pessimism or optimism, you can view our world as being in a short-term period of balance in a favorable condition. It's in balance now, but it may be that it is unstable, i.e. that some possible nudge may send it veering out of that favorable period. So, if you are as dystopian as I and you want something to keep you awake at night, remind yourself that we (humans, our civilization, our economic and political systems) are doing everything we can to give that balanced but unstable system as many nudges and pokes as we can. We are living in a time period that is a very pleasant anomaly. Those pleasant conditions could go away due to any number of complex, interacting forces that are outside of our control. And, we are doing everything possible that is in our control to change those current conditions. What makes "Apocalyptic planet" fascinating is that in between all the stories about the places he visits (deserts, ice sheets in Greenland, glaciers in South America, etc) and the stories about the people he is there with, are perspectives and perceptions about all manner of possible pasts and possible futures and how and why we might get to any one of more of those possible futures. It's a book that is about as mind-expanding as you could ask for. The perspectives from "Apocalyptic planet" make the point of view of Elizabeth Kolbert's "The sixth extinction" (which I very much encourage you to read) seem small, self-centered, and local by comparison. And, yet another even more pessimistic point of view. In spite of all our talk about doing something to stop the trend toward global warming, we are *not* going to do anything even remotely effective to stop it. Our present system (capitalism, liberal democracy, whatever) including its massive use of resources and burning of fossil fuels has raised the standard of living of so many people in the last hundred years, so that we will *not* change that. So much wealth is in the hands of and controlled by powerful interests, interests whose wealth and power is tied up in those resources and fuels and their exploitation that we (they) will *not* voluntarily give that wealth up. It does not even make sense to suggest that it would happen. Imagine, Childs prompts, that in the near future we make the technological break-throughs needed to enable us to control the climate and its trends. That possibility might be more frightening yet. Remember, we are discussing a dynamic, non-linear, chaotic system. It's a system whose future we cannot predict, and so, it's even more likely that we would not be able to predict the effects of any forces we apply to it. We are as likely to over-shoot as not. Our actions are capable of having totally unexpected consequences. The idea that we might try is truly scary. But, fear not, we are likely take those kinds of actions only if someone believes that they can make a huge profit by doing so. Childs is in some sense a travel writer and an extremely lyrical one. Listening to him describe the places he visits, whether deserts or dramatic mountains or mono-culture farming in mid-west U.S. is a delight. "Apocalyptic planet" is not your "normal" environmental apocalyptic book, but it is apocalyptic, and very fascinating. 08/17/2014 .. vim:ft=rst:fo+=a: